| 24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 943 | 回復(fù): 4 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問(wèn)題,作者西西弗斯_Dux將贈(zèng)送您 75 個(gè)金幣 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
西西弗斯_Dux銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
求助,審稿意見(jiàn)該怎么回復(fù)。 已有2人參與
|
||
|
小白第一次投sci,等了兩個(gè)月等到這樣的評(píng)論,該如何修改完善呢? 1.The theoretical bases of the article are difficult to follow because they are written just citing the literature sources of the different algorithms used in the work without explaining in an articulated way what they are about, how they are used and, above all, why they are used with corrosion data.文章的理論基礎(chǔ)很難理解,因?yàn)樗鼈冎皇且昧斯ぷ髦惺褂玫牟煌惴ǖ奈墨I(xiàn)來(lái)源,而沒(méi)有以清晰的方式解釋它們的含義、它們的使用方式以及最重要的,為什么它們用于腐蝕數(shù)據(jù)。 2.Also, from the explanations given in the manuscript it would be impossible to reproduce the procedures proposed, should someone other than the authors wanted to do it. For example, the authors talk about “features”, without explaining what they mean. Are they corrosion defect depths or areas? Or perhaps remaining pipeline thickness? Or are they referencing pipeline/environment parameters that determine the corrosion rate? This is what one would assume when seeing the initials in Figure 2, in which, by the way, there are no explanations either.此外,從手稿中給出的解釋來(lái)看,如果作者以外的人想這樣做,就不可能重現(xiàn)所提出的程序。例如,作者談到“特征”,但沒(méi)有解釋它們的含義。它們是腐蝕缺陷的深度還是面積?或者是剩余的管道厚度?或者它們是指決定腐蝕速率的管道/環(huán)境參數(shù)?這是人們?cè)诳吹綀D 2 中的首字母時(shí)會(huì)假設(shè)的,順便說(shuō)一句,其中也沒(méi)有任何解釋。 3.Later on, in Section 4.2.1, the authors finally talk briefly about specific calculations, using data that were collected elsewhere, not by the authors themselves. On page 4, line 45, it is stated: “The output data of the ELM is the corrosion rate of the pipeline”. This is where the central question appears. What corrosion rate do the authors use to validate the algorithms? A lot of articles have been written trying to develop methods and models to estimate the rate of corrosion in pipelines, and that remains an open topic. Everything seems to indicate that the authors calculate the corrosion rate as the simple division of the maximum depth of the localized corrosion defects by the reported in [30] service time of the pipelines. This would give a simplistic value of dubious usefulness since localized corrosion does not necessarily begin immediately after the installation of the ducts, given that they are coated and cathodically protected. Not to mention that the linear model of corrosion defects growth has been repeatedly questioned and there is agreement in at least part of the community that it does not work to provide a correct description of the progress of localized corrosion in pipelines. So if the corrosion rate data used to validate the algorithms are not reliable, the conclusions obtained in this work are misleading at best.后來(lái),在第 4.2.1 節(jié)中,作者終于簡(jiǎn)要討論了具體的計(jì)算,使用的數(shù)據(jù)是從其他地方收集的,而不是作者自己收集的。在第 4 頁(yè)第 45 行,它指出:“ELM 的輸出數(shù)據(jù)是管道的腐蝕速率”。 這就是核心問(wèn)題出現(xiàn)的地方。作者使用什么腐蝕速率來(lái)驗(yàn)證算法?已經(jīng)有很多文章試圖開(kāi)發(fā)方法和模型來(lái)估計(jì)管道的腐蝕速率,但這仍然是一個(gè)懸而未決的話題。一切似乎都表明,作者將腐蝕速率計(jì)算為局部腐蝕缺陷的最大深度除以[30]中報(bào)告的管道使用時(shí)間。這將給出一個(gè)可疑的簡(jiǎn)單值,因?yàn)榫植扛g不一定在管道安裝后立即開(kāi)始,因?yàn)樗鼈冇型繉雍完帢O保護(hù)。更不用說(shuō)腐蝕缺陷增長(zhǎng)的線性模型一再受到質(zhì)疑,至少有一部分社區(qū)一致認(rèn)為,它不能正確描述管道局部腐蝕的進(jìn)展。 因此,如果用于驗(yàn)證算法的腐蝕速率數(shù)據(jù)不可靠,那么這項(xiàng)工作得出的結(jié)論充其量也只是誤導(dǎo)。 |
新蟲(chóng) (知名作家)
新蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
|
這很簡(jiǎn)單啊 審稿人說(shuō)的都是沒(méi)有解釋清楚的問(wèn)題。寫論文是這樣的,你要說(shuō)清楚具體是怎么做的,不然讀者看不到細(xì)節(jié),只有你自己知道。 按要求一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)解釋,擴(kuò)充原稿件就好了 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)IOS客戶端 |
銅蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小木蟲(chóng)085600 2026-03-09 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 接受26屆調(diào)劑生 +20 | 豬豬豬毛 2026-03-06 | 20/1000 |
|
|
[考研] A區(qū)一本交叉課題組,低分調(diào)劑,招收機(jī)械電子信息通信等交叉方向 +54 | lisimayy 2026-03-04 | 67/3350 |
|
|
[考研] 313求調(diào)劑 +4 | Yyt楊1 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程330分求調(diào)劑,一志愿985 +3 | 小材化本科 2026-03-07 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程307,求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我要燃燒你的夢(mèng) 2026-03-08 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +7 | ounce. 2026-03-05 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +5 | 一二LV 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 322分 085600求調(diào)劑,有互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+國(guó)金及主持省級(jí)大創(chuàng)經(jīng)歷 +4 | 熊境喆 2026-03-05 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑292分 +3 | 打烊eee 2026-03-07 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)0856材料與化工,前三科206,總分283,求調(diào)劑 +7 | 26考研求調(diào)劑 2026-03-06 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +3 | 看看我. 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工354調(diào)劑 +4 | Lucy-xiao 2026-03-06 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +3 | 林小星發(fā)大財(cái) 2026-03-05 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 271求調(diào)劑 +7 | 月色c 2026-03-05 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 293分求調(diào)劑 +3 | SivanNano. 2026-03-05 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料085600 303求調(diào)劑 +7 | 1bygone 2026-03-04 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料328求調(diào)劑 +10 | 一個(gè)蘿卜02 2026-03-03 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué) 280 一志愿太原理工 求調(diào)劑 +8 | 拾玖壹 2026-03-04 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 347分電子信息專碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | 咕嘟咕嘟1 2026-03-03 | 3/150 |
|