| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 941 | 回復(fù): 4 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者西西弗斯_Dux將贈(zèng)送您 75 個(gè)金幣 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
西西弗斯_Dux銅蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
求助,審稿意見該怎么回復(fù)! 已有2人參與
|
||
|
小白第一次投sci,等了兩個(gè)月等到這樣的評(píng)論,該如何修改完善呢? 1.The theoretical bases of the article are difficult to follow because they are written just citing the literature sources of the different algorithms used in the work without explaining in an articulated way what they are about, how they are used and, above all, why they are used with corrosion data.文章的理論基礎(chǔ)很難理解,因?yàn)樗鼈冎皇且昧斯ぷ髦惺褂玫牟煌惴ǖ奈墨I(xiàn)來(lái)源,而沒有以清晰的方式解釋它們的含義、它們的使用方式以及最重要的,為什么它們用于腐蝕數(shù)據(jù)。 2.Also, from the explanations given in the manuscript it would be impossible to reproduce the procedures proposed, should someone other than the authors wanted to do it. For example, the authors talk about “features”, without explaining what they mean. Are they corrosion defect depths or areas? Or perhaps remaining pipeline thickness? Or are they referencing pipeline/environment parameters that determine the corrosion rate? This is what one would assume when seeing the initials in Figure 2, in which, by the way, there are no explanations either.此外,從手稿中給出的解釋來(lái)看,如果作者以外的人想這樣做,就不可能重現(xiàn)所提出的程序。例如,作者談到“特征”,但沒有解釋它們的含義。它們是腐蝕缺陷的深度還是面積?或者是剩余的管道厚度?或者它們是指決定腐蝕速率的管道/環(huán)境參數(shù)?這是人們?cè)诳吹綀D 2 中的首字母時(shí)會(huì)假設(shè)的,順便說一句,其中也沒有任何解釋。 3.Later on, in Section 4.2.1, the authors finally talk briefly about specific calculations, using data that were collected elsewhere, not by the authors themselves. On page 4, line 45, it is stated: “The output data of the ELM is the corrosion rate of the pipeline”. This is where the central question appears. What corrosion rate do the authors use to validate the algorithms? A lot of articles have been written trying to develop methods and models to estimate the rate of corrosion in pipelines, and that remains an open topic. Everything seems to indicate that the authors calculate the corrosion rate as the simple division of the maximum depth of the localized corrosion defects by the reported in [30] service time of the pipelines. This would give a simplistic value of dubious usefulness since localized corrosion does not necessarily begin immediately after the installation of the ducts, given that they are coated and cathodically protected. Not to mention that the linear model of corrosion defects growth has been repeatedly questioned and there is agreement in at least part of the community that it does not work to provide a correct description of the progress of localized corrosion in pipelines. So if the corrosion rate data used to validate the algorithms are not reliable, the conclusions obtained in this work are misleading at best.后來(lái),在第 4.2.1 節(jié)中,作者終于簡(jiǎn)要討論了具體的計(jì)算,使用的數(shù)據(jù)是從其他地方收集的,而不是作者自己收集的。在第 4 頁(yè)第 45 行,它指出:“ELM 的輸出數(shù)據(jù)是管道的腐蝕速率”。 這就是核心問題出現(xiàn)的地方。作者使用什么腐蝕速率來(lái)驗(yàn)證算法?已經(jīng)有很多文章試圖開發(fā)方法和模型來(lái)估計(jì)管道的腐蝕速率,但這仍然是一個(gè)懸而未決的話題。一切似乎都表明,作者將腐蝕速率計(jì)算為局部腐蝕缺陷的最大深度除以[30]中報(bào)告的管道使用時(shí)間。這將給出一個(gè)可疑的簡(jiǎn)單值,因?yàn)榫植扛g不一定在管道安裝后立即開始,因?yàn)樗鼈冇型繉雍完帢O保護(hù)。更不用說腐蝕缺陷增長(zhǎng)的線性模型一再受到質(zhì)疑,至少有一部分社區(qū)一致認(rèn)為,它不能正確描述管道局部腐蝕的進(jìn)展。 因此,如果用于驗(yàn)證算法的腐蝕速率數(shù)據(jù)不可靠,那么這項(xiàng)工作得出的結(jié)論充其量也只是誤導(dǎo)。 |
銅蟲 (小有名氣)
新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
這很簡(jiǎn)單啊 審稿人說的都是沒有解釋清楚的問題。寫論文是這樣的,你要說清楚具體是怎么做的,不然讀者看不到細(xì)節(jié),只有你自己知道。 按要求一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)解釋,擴(kuò)充原稿件就好了 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (知名作家)
超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工296分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 稻妻小編 2026-03-09 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 新疆大學(xué)地質(zhì)與礦業(yè)工程學(xué)院招生 +24 | another12 2026-03-04 | 32/1600 |
|
|
[考研]
|
簡(jiǎn)木ChuFront 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工,一志愿廣州985,求調(diào)劑 +14 | qqyyaill 2026-03-05 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考博] 申博 +5 | 添菜了哈 2026-03-04 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +5 | 幼稚園大班打手 2026-03-08 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 290 材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +7 | Nebulala 2026-03-08 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +8 | Trying] 2026-03-06 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程專業(yè),初試305,均過國(guó)家A區(qū)線 +7 | 卡卡來(lái)了@ 2026-03-07 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中石油,化學(xué)工程,301求調(diào)劑 +4 | 豚饅枳枳 2026-03-04 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考博] 2026年博士名額撿漏 +4 | 科研ya 2026-03-04 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)專業(yè)調(diào)劑 +5 | 好好好1233 2026-03-04 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 化工282求調(diào)劑一志愿211 +5 | NA0912 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工,291,求調(diào)劑 +7 | 咕嚕咕嚕123123 2026-03-05 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +5 | ws 上岸鴨 2026-03-05 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求材料調(diào)劑 +4 | berdmond 2026-03-05 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 293分求調(diào)劑 +3 | SivanNano. 2026-03-05 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 泡了個(gè)椒 2026-03-04 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 274環(huán)境工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 扶柳盈江 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程 求調(diào)劑 +7 | xiiiia 2026-03-04 | 7/350 |
|