| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 931 | 回復(fù): 4 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者西西弗斯_Dux將贈(zèng)送您 75 個(gè)金幣 | |||
西西弗斯_Dux銅蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
求助,審稿意見該怎么回復(fù)! 已有2人參與
|
||
|
小白第一次投sci,等了兩個(gè)月等到這樣的評論,該如何修改完善呢? 1.The theoretical bases of the article are difficult to follow because they are written just citing the literature sources of the different algorithms used in the work without explaining in an articulated way what they are about, how they are used and, above all, why they are used with corrosion data.文章的理論基礎(chǔ)很難理解,因?yàn)樗鼈冎皇且昧斯ぷ髦惺褂玫牟煌惴ǖ奈墨I(xiàn)來源,而沒有以清晰的方式解釋它們的含義、它們的使用方式以及最重要的,為什么它們用于腐蝕數(shù)據(jù)。 2.Also, from the explanations given in the manuscript it would be impossible to reproduce the procedures proposed, should someone other than the authors wanted to do it. For example, the authors talk about “features”, without explaining what they mean. Are they corrosion defect depths or areas? Or perhaps remaining pipeline thickness? Or are they referencing pipeline/environment parameters that determine the corrosion rate? This is what one would assume when seeing the initials in Figure 2, in which, by the way, there are no explanations either.此外,從手稿中給出的解釋來看,如果作者以外的人想這樣做,就不可能重現(xiàn)所提出的程序。例如,作者談到“特征”,但沒有解釋它們的含義。它們是腐蝕缺陷的深度還是面積?或者是剩余的管道厚度?或者它們是指決定腐蝕速率的管道/環(huán)境參數(shù)?這是人們在看到圖 2 中的首字母時(shí)會假設(shè)的,順便說一句,其中也沒有任何解釋。 3.Later on, in Section 4.2.1, the authors finally talk briefly about specific calculations, using data that were collected elsewhere, not by the authors themselves. On page 4, line 45, it is stated: “The output data of the ELM is the corrosion rate of the pipeline”. This is where the central question appears. What corrosion rate do the authors use to validate the algorithms? A lot of articles have been written trying to develop methods and models to estimate the rate of corrosion in pipelines, and that remains an open topic. Everything seems to indicate that the authors calculate the corrosion rate as the simple division of the maximum depth of the localized corrosion defects by the reported in [30] service time of the pipelines. This would give a simplistic value of dubious usefulness since localized corrosion does not necessarily begin immediately after the installation of the ducts, given that they are coated and cathodically protected. Not to mention that the linear model of corrosion defects growth has been repeatedly questioned and there is agreement in at least part of the community that it does not work to provide a correct description of the progress of localized corrosion in pipelines. So if the corrosion rate data used to validate the algorithms are not reliable, the conclusions obtained in this work are misleading at best.后來,在第 4.2.1 節(jié)中,作者終于簡要討論了具體的計(jì)算,使用的數(shù)據(jù)是從其他地方收集的,而不是作者自己收集的。在第 4 頁第 45 行,它指出:“ELM 的輸出數(shù)據(jù)是管道的腐蝕速率”。 這就是核心問題出現(xiàn)的地方。作者使用什么腐蝕速率來驗(yàn)證算法?已經(jīng)有很多文章試圖開發(fā)方法和模型來估計(jì)管道的腐蝕速率,但這仍然是一個(gè)懸而未決的話題。一切似乎都表明,作者將腐蝕速率計(jì)算為局部腐蝕缺陷的最大深度除以[30]中報(bào)告的管道使用時(shí)間。這將給出一個(gè)可疑的簡單值,因?yàn)榫植扛g不一定在管道安裝后立即開始,因?yàn)樗鼈冇型繉雍完帢O保護(hù)。更不用說腐蝕缺陷增長的線性模型一再受到質(zhì)疑,至少有一部分社區(qū)一致認(rèn)為,它不能正確描述管道局部腐蝕的進(jìn)展。 因此,如果用于驗(yàn)證算法的腐蝕速率數(shù)據(jù)不可靠,那么這項(xiàng)工作得出的結(jié)論充其量也只是誤導(dǎo)。 |
新蟲 (小有名氣)
|
這很簡單啊 審稿人說的都是沒有解釋清楚的問題。寫論文是這樣的,你要說清楚具體是怎么做的,不然讀者看不到細(xì)節(jié),只有你自己知道。 按要求一點(diǎn)點(diǎn)解釋,擴(kuò)充原稿件就好了 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
銅蟲 (小有名氣)
新蟲 (知名作家)
超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求調(diào)劑 +7 | 邱gl 2026-03-05 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿蘇大材料工程專碩293求調(diào)劑 +3 | 鋼鐵大炮 2026-03-04 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工,一志愿廣州985,求調(diào)劑 +8 | qqyyaill 2026-03-05 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 【求調(diào)劑】293分環(huán)境工程求調(diào)劑材料/化工,服從調(diào)劑,抗壓能力強(qiáng)! +8 | xiiiia 2026-03-04 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩318求調(diào)劑 +19 | February_Feb 2026-03-01 | 21/1050 |
|
|
[考研] 紡織、生物、化學(xué)、材料等專業(yè) +3 | Eember. 2026-03-05 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿東北大學(xué)080500,英一數(shù)二343分求調(diào)劑 +5 | Seele_v5 2026-03-04 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +7 | 曼殊2266 2026-02-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩080500復(fù)試調(diào)劑294 +3 | 四葉zjz 2026-03-04 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 070300調(diào)劑一志愿南京大學(xué)化學(xué)專業(yè),初試273分,有論文有專利有競賽,求調(diào)劑B區(qū)211 +3 | 82206202 2026-02-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 博斯特525 2026-03-04 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085601 材料305分求助 +4 | 泡泡郵件 2026-03-03 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +8 | yang婷 2026-03-02 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 338求調(diào)劑 +5 | 18162027187 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 化工京區(qū)271求調(diào)劑 +7 | 11ing 2026-03-02 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +11 | yunziaaaaa 2026-03-01 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | repeatt?t 2026-02-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料284求調(diào)劑,一志愿鄭州大學(xué)英一數(shù)二專碩 +15 | 想上岸的土撥鼠 2026-02-28 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 264求調(diào)劑 +4 | 巴拉巴拉根556 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料類求調(diào)劑 +11 | wana_kiko 2026-02-28 | 14/700 |
|