 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 929 | 回復(fù): 4 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題，作者西西弗斯_Dux將贈送您 75 個金幣 | |||
西西弗斯_Dux銅蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
求助，審稿意見該怎么回復(fù)�。� 已有2人參與
|
||
|
小白第一次投sci，等了兩個月等到這樣的評論，該如何修改完善呢？ 1.The theoretical bases of the article are difficult to follow because they are written just citing the literature sources of the different algorithms used in the work without explaining in an articulated way what they are about, how they are used and, above all, why they are used with corrosion data.文章的理論基礎(chǔ)很難理解，因為它們只是引用了工作中使用的不同算法的文獻來源，而沒有以清晰的方式解釋它們的含義、它們的使用方式以及最重要的，為什么它們用于腐蝕數(shù)據(jù)。 2.Also, from the explanations given in the manuscript it would be impossible to reproduce the procedures proposed, should someone other than the authors wanted to do it. For example, the authors talk about “features”, without explaining what they mean. Are they corrosion defect depths or areas? Or perhaps remaining pipeline thickness? Or are they referencing pipeline/environment parameters that determine the corrosion rate? This is what one would assume when seeing the initials in Figure 2, in which, by the way, there are no explanations either.此外，從手稿中給出的解釋來看，如果作者以外的人想這樣做，就不可能重現(xiàn)所提出的程序。例如，作者談到“特征”，但沒有解釋它們的含義。它們是腐蝕缺陷的深度還是面積？或者是剩余的管道厚度？或者它們是指決定腐蝕速率的管道/環(huán)境參數(shù)？這是人們在看到圖 2 中的首字母時會假設(shè)的，順便說一句，其中也沒有任何解釋。 3.Later on, in Section 4.2.1, the authors finally talk briefly about specific calculations, using data that were collected elsewhere, not by the authors themselves. On page 4, line 45, it is stated: “The output data of the ELM is the corrosion rate of the pipeline”. This is where the central question appears. What corrosion rate do the authors use to validate the algorithms? A lot of articles have been written trying to develop methods and models to estimate the rate of corrosion in pipelines, and that remains an open topic. Everything seems to indicate that the authors calculate the corrosion rate as the simple division of the maximum depth of the localized corrosion defects by the reported in [30] service time of the pipelines. This would give a simplistic value of dubious usefulness since localized corrosion does not necessarily begin immediately after the installation of the ducts, given that they are coated and cathodically protected. Not to mention that the linear model of corrosion defects growth has been repeatedly questioned and there is agreement in at least part of the community that it does not work to provide a correct description of the progress of localized corrosion in pipelines. So if the corrosion rate data used to validate the algorithms are not reliable, the conclusions obtained in this work are misleading at best.后來，在第 4.2.1 節(jié)中，作者終于簡要討論了具體的計算，使用的數(shù)據(jù)是從其他地方收集的，而不是作者自己收集的。在第 4 頁第 45 行，它指出：“ELM 的輸出數(shù)據(jù)是管道的腐蝕速率”。 這就是核心問題出現(xiàn)的地方。作者使用什么腐蝕速率來驗證算法？已經(jīng)有很多文章試圖開發(fā)方法和模型來估計管道的腐蝕速率，但這仍然是一個懸而未決的話題。一切似乎都表明，作者將腐蝕速率計算為局部腐蝕缺陷的最大深度除以[30]中報告的管道使用時間。這將給出一個可疑的簡單值，因為局部腐蝕不一定在管道安裝后立即開始，因為它們有涂層和陰極保護。更不用說腐蝕缺陷增長的線性模型一再受到質(zhì)疑，至少有一部分社區(qū)一致認為，它不能正確描述管道局部腐蝕的進展。 因此，如果用于驗證算法的腐蝕速率數(shù)據(jù)不可靠，那么這項工作得出的結(jié)論充其量也只是誤導(dǎo)。 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
歡迎211本科同學，過A區(qū)國家線，A區(qū)非偏遠一本，交叉學科課題組
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
成果系統(tǒng)訪問量大，請15分鐘后再嘗試。由此給您造成的不便，敬請諒解。
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
281電子信息求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
材料277分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑院校
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
293求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
化學 0703求調(diào)劑 總分293 一志愿211
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
320材料一志愿西工大專碩英二數(shù)二 有兩年光伏工作經(jīng)驗
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
材料328求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
304分材料專碩求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
yibuxiao
新蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 451.9
- 散金: 53
- 帖子: 136
- 在線: 16.8小時
- 蟲號: 4255037
- 注冊: 2015-11-29
- 專業(yè): 制造系統(tǒng)與自動化
|
這很簡單啊 審稿人說的都是沒有解釋清楚的問題。寫論文是這樣的，你要說清楚具體是怎么做的，不然讀者看不到細節(jié)，只有你自己知道。 按要求一點點解釋，擴充原稿件就好了 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
2樓2024-07-12 11:48:00
西西弗斯_Dux
銅蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 142.6
- 帖子: 55
- 在線: 25.8小時
- 蟲號: 29025485
- 注冊: 2022-03-10
- 專業(yè): 石油天然氣開采
3樓2024-07-12 14:08:11
nandi2212
新蟲 (知名作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 27 (小學生)
- 金幣: 16407.1
- 散金: 2535
- 紅花: 35
- 帖子: 6908
- 在線: 4982.3小時
- 蟲號: 90223
- 注冊: 2005-08-31
- 性別: GG
4樓2024-07-12 14:20:12
nono2009
超級版主 (文學泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
專家經(jīng)驗: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 應(yīng)助: 28684 (院士)
- 貴賓: 513.911
- 金幣: 2555220
- 散金: 27828
- 紅花: 2147
- 沙發(fā): 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在線: 65200.9小時
- 蟲號: 827383
- 注冊: 2009-08-13
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 工程熱物理與能源利用
- 管轄: 科研家籌備委員會
5樓2024-07-13 09:00:12
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 西西弗斯_Dux 的主題更新
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 化學 0703求調(diào)劑 總分293 一志愿211 +8 | 土土小蟲 2026-03-03 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300調(diào)劑一志愿南京大學化學專業(yè)，初試273分，有論文有專利有競賽，求調(diào)劑B區(qū)211 +3 | 82206202 2026-02-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭州大學，學碩，物理化學， 333求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李魔女斗篷 2026-03-04 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 一志愿中南大學理學化學
+6
|
15779376950 2026-03-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 322,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 菜菜愛玩 2026-03-04 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 264求調(diào)劑 +3 | thext 2026-03-03 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0854總分272 +5 | 打小就是老實人 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703 總分319求調(diào)劑 +4 | Xinyuu 2026-03-02 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學306調(diào)劑 +4 | 26要上岸 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +7 | BrightLL 2026-03-02 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中科大能動297求調(diào)劑，本科川大 +3 | 邵11 2026-03-03 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料學碩318求調(diào)劑 +15 | February_Feb 2026-03-01 | 17/850 |
|
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +3 | MuoLuo1312 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化工335求調(diào)劑 +5 | 摸摸貓貓頭 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | repeatt?t 2026-02-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +7 | 明遠求學 2026-03-01 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 此成果不能導(dǎo)入原因：元數(shù)據(jù)必填信息不完整，可 進行補充。 +4 | Kittylucky 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +3 | dua1 2026-03-01 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +3 | Y墨明棋妙Y 2026-02-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 317一志愿華南理工電氣工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | Soliloquy_Q 2026-02-28 | 11/550 |
|