| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 648 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
ZY19960414新蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
論文被拒有必要申訴嗎?求大佬幫看看。 已有1人參與
|
||
|
The three-dimensional flow field around a hypersonic vehicle was numerically simulated in the study. The manuscript focused on the realistic reentry plasma sheath, the electron density and temperature at the hypersonic reentry stage. It was shown that the maximal total pressure on the leeward side decreased with the angle of attack and that on the windward side increased with the angle of attack, in agreement with previous studies. The results showed that the thickness of the plasma sheath increased on the leeward side, but the electron density decreased. Since electron density is related to reduction of electromagnetic wave, so radio communication on the leeward side at a large angle of attack might overcome the communication ‘blackout’. These results might be helpful for seeking the way to eliminate ‘blackout’ at reentry stage. however, there are some flaws in the paper. The necessity of 3D simulations was not discussed. It seems that all conclusions obtained from 3D and experiments can also be drawn from 2D simulations. The three-dimensionality of the flow should play a role in determining the flow around the vehicle, which should be discussed to prove the importance of 3D simulations. Unfortunately, there is no further talk about 3D simulations, except for validating the 3D computations. One of the highlights of the study is the decreased electron density with increasing the angle of attack. The underlying physics of this event should be discussed or supposed in the paper, even though it might be still elusive. Moreover, whether this phenomenon has been found in previous 2D simulations is neither introduced nor discussed. These issues should be explored and addressed in this paper. Substantial revision following the academic standards in proper written English is necessary. For example, ‘AOA’ should be explained at the first appearance of the term. The manuscript is not recommended to publish. 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (正式寫手)
銅蟲 (正式寫手)

新蟲 (正式寫手)
|
以上是審稿意見,1.主要問題審稿人要的就是三維對(duì)比二維的優(yōu)點(diǎn)在哪,為什么要用三維算流場。但是二維就算不了攻角的情況,旋轉(zhuǎn)軸對(duì)稱每個(gè)位置的流場分布都是不一樣的。我只是截取XOY比較容易分析而已,審稿專家就抓著二維也可以仿真攻角。2.確定對(duì)給出的結(jié)論分析不夠,但感覺可以進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充。3還有就是語言問題。但是最主要的問題覺得他提出來是錯(cuò)的。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿211,0860總分286食品工程專業(yè)求調(diào)劑 +7 | 林林Winnie 2026-03-05 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿天大化工(085600)調(diào)劑總分338 +5 | 蔡大美女 2026-03-09 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩調(diào)劑 +7 | 慕辰123 2026-03-05 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工 326 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 熱愛生活ing 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 家人們 調(diào)劑不迷路 看這里 +8 | likeihood 2026-03-09 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山東大學(xué),總分327,英語二79,有論文,有競賽,已過四六級(jí) +3 | 木木目目1 2026-03-09 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 320材料與化工,求調(diào)劑 +11 | 鶴遨予卿 2026-03-04 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博自薦 +9 | 烷基八氮- 2026-03-06 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 269求調(diào)劑 +3 | 朔朔話 2026-03-08 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +5 | G212 2026-03-03 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)求調(diào)劑292分 +3 | 打烊eee 2026-03-07 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 第一志愿上海大學(xué),專業(yè)化學(xué)工程與技術(shù),總分288,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 1829197082 2026-03-07 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,學(xué)校研究所都可以,材料與化工267分 +6 | wmx1 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 271求調(diào)劑 +7 | 月色c 2026-03-05 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程 求調(diào)劑 +7 | xiiiia 2026-03-04 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 267調(diào)劑求助 +5 | 聰少OZ 2026-03-04 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué) 0703求調(diào)劑 總分293 一志愿211 +9 | 土土小蟲 2026-03-03 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué) 280 一志愿太原理工 求調(diào)劑 +8 | 拾玖壹 2026-03-04 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 322分 085600求調(diào)劑,有互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+國金及主持省級(jí)大創(chuàng)經(jīng)歷 +6 | 熊境喆 2026-03-04 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)306調(diào)劑 +4 | 26要上岸 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|