| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 651 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
ZY19960414新蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
論文被拒有必要申訴嗎?求大佬幫看看。 已有1人參與
|
||
|
The three-dimensional flow field around a hypersonic vehicle was numerically simulated in the study. The manuscript focused on the realistic reentry plasma sheath, the electron density and temperature at the hypersonic reentry stage. It was shown that the maximal total pressure on the leeward side decreased with the angle of attack and that on the windward side increased with the angle of attack, in agreement with previous studies. The results showed that the thickness of the plasma sheath increased on the leeward side, but the electron density decreased. Since electron density is related to reduction of electromagnetic wave, so radio communication on the leeward side at a large angle of attack might overcome the communication ‘blackout’. These results might be helpful for seeking the way to eliminate ‘blackout’ at reentry stage. however, there are some flaws in the paper. The necessity of 3D simulations was not discussed. It seems that all conclusions obtained from 3D and experiments can also be drawn from 2D simulations. The three-dimensionality of the flow should play a role in determining the flow around the vehicle, which should be discussed to prove the importance of 3D simulations. Unfortunately, there is no further talk about 3D simulations, except for validating the 3D computations. One of the highlights of the study is the decreased electron density with increasing the angle of attack. The underlying physics of this event should be discussed or supposed in the paper, even though it might be still elusive. Moreover, whether this phenomenon has been found in previous 2D simulations is neither introduced nor discussed. These issues should be explored and addressed in this paper. Substantial revision following the academic standards in proper written English is necessary. For example, ‘AOA’ should be explained at the first appearance of the term. The manuscript is not recommended to publish. 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (正式寫手)
|
以上是審稿意見(jiàn),1.主要問(wèn)題審稿人要的就是三維對(duì)比二維的優(yōu)點(diǎn)在哪,為什么要用三維算流場(chǎng)。但是二維就算不了攻角的情況,旋轉(zhuǎn)軸對(duì)稱每個(gè)位置的流場(chǎng)分布都是不一樣的。我只是截取XOY比較容易分析而已,審稿專家就抓著二維也可以仿真攻角。2.確定對(duì)給出的結(jié)論分析不夠,但感覺(jué)可以進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充。3還有就是語(yǔ)言問(wèn)題。但是最主要的問(wèn)題覺(jué)得他提出來(lái)是錯(cuò)的。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
銅蟲 (正式寫手)

新蟲 (正式寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 大連大學(xué)化學(xué)專業(yè)研究生調(diào)劑 +3 | 琪久. 2026-03-10 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 工科0856專碩化學(xué)工程269能調(diào)劑嗎 +6 | 我想讀研11 2026-03-10 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博求助 +3 | 跳躍餅干 2026-03-10 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考博] 讀博申請(qǐng) +4 | 感dd 2026-03-10 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | yfihxh 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 337一志愿華南理工材料求調(diào)劑 +5 | mysdl 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0817一志愿蘇州大學(xué)280復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +9 | kk扛 2026-03-07 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考博] 求材料讀博院校 +9 | yanglei131 2026-03-08 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 0817化學(xué)工程319求調(diào)劑 +7 | lv945 2026-03-08 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +6 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-08 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 考研一志愿長(zhǎng)安大學(xué)材料與化工309分請(qǐng)求調(diào)劑 +6 | dtdxzxx 2026-03-06 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,數(shù)一英一274分 +4 | 小菲會(huì)努力 2026-03-08 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 083000環(huán)境科學(xué)與工程調(diào)劑 +5 | 加油呀fxy 2026-03-07 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 083000,總分284,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 徐yr 2026-03-04 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +7 | ounce. 2026-03-05 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 081700學(xué)碩一志愿北京化工大學(xué)數(shù)二英一過(guò)六級(jí)有競(jìng)賽求調(diào)劑 +5 | galaxary 2026-03-07 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考博] 2026申博自薦 六級(jí)440電催化方向 +4 | 櫻落成影花成雙 2026-03-05 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +5 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-05 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 274環(huán)境工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 扶柳盈江 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 320材料一志愿西工大專碩英二數(shù)二 有兩年光伏工作經(jīng)驗(yàn) +5 | 錘某人 2026-03-04 | 8/400 |
|