| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 647 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
ZY19960414新蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
論文被拒有必要申訴嗎?求大佬幫看看。 已有1人參與
|
|
The three-dimensional flow field around a hypersonic vehicle was numerically simulated in the study. The manuscript focused on the realistic reentry plasma sheath, the electron density and temperature at the hypersonic reentry stage. It was shown that the maximal total pressure on the leeward side decreased with the angle of attack and that on the windward side increased with the angle of attack, in agreement with previous studies. The results showed that the thickness of the plasma sheath increased on the leeward side, but the electron density decreased. Since electron density is related to reduction of electromagnetic wave, so radio communication on the leeward side at a large angle of attack might overcome the communication ‘blackout’. These results might be helpful for seeking the way to eliminate ‘blackout’ at reentry stage. however, there are some flaws in the paper. The necessity of 3D simulations was not discussed. It seems that all conclusions obtained from 3D and experiments can also be drawn from 2D simulations. The three-dimensionality of the flow should play a role in determining the flow around the vehicle, which should be discussed to prove the importance of 3D simulations. Unfortunately, there is no further talk about 3D simulations, except for validating the 3D computations. One of the highlights of the study is the decreased electron density with increasing the angle of attack. The underlying physics of this event should be discussed or supposed in the paper, even though it might be still elusive. Moreover, whether this phenomenon has been found in previous 2D simulations is neither introduced nor discussed. These issues should be explored and addressed in this paper. Substantial revision following the academic standards in proper written English is necessary. For example, ‘AOA’ should be explained at the first appearance of the term. The manuscript is not recommended to publish. 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)IOS客戶端 |
銅蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)

新蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
以上是審稿意見(jiàn),1.主要問(wèn)題審稿人要的就是三維對(duì)比二維的優(yōu)點(diǎn)在哪,為什么要用三維算流場(chǎng)。但是二維就算不了攻角的情況,旋轉(zhuǎn)軸對(duì)稱每個(gè)位置的流場(chǎng)分布都是不一樣的。我只是截取XOY比較容易分析而已,審稿專家就抓著二維也可以仿真攻角。2.確定對(duì)給出的結(jié)論分析不夠,但感覺(jué)可以進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充。3還有就是語(yǔ)言問(wèn)題。但是最主要的問(wèn)題覺(jué)得他提出來(lái)是錯(cuò)的。 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)IOS客戶端 |
新蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 收調(diào)劑 +3 | 調(diào)劑的考研學(xué)生 2026-03-10 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑(085602一志愿985) +6 | 化工人999 2026-03-09 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程085601調(diào)劑求老師收留 +5 | 強(qiáng)木木木 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 320材料與化工,求調(diào)劑 +11 | 鶴遨予卿 2026-03-04 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +3 | wyx79618 2026-03-06 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 293一志愿華東理工 0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù) 調(diào)劑 +5 | fjj0912 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿江南大學(xué),食品科學(xué)與工程,總分,320 +3 | yyyyyukino 2026-03-07 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +6 | Bananaiy 2026-03-04 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 招調(diào)劑 +20 | 帆船哥 2026-03-04 | 23/1150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
程晴之 2026-03-06 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中石油,化學(xué)工程,301求調(diào)劑 +4 | 豚饅枳枳 2026-03-04 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 08工科求調(diào)劑 +3 | 隆LLL 2026-03-06 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +3 | 看看我. 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +5 | danyyyy 2026-03-04 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研339求調(diào)劑 +3 | Karry*^_^* 2026-03-04 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 考研282分求調(diào)劑,接受跨專業(yè) +4 | 劉淄博 2026-03-04 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 271求調(diào)劑 +7 | 月色c 2026-03-05 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理085601專碩347分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 啊歐歐歐 2026-03-04 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 博斯特525 2026-03-04 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿314求調(diào)劑 +7 | 202111120625 2026-03-03 | 7/350 |
|