| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 650 | 回復: 3 | |||
ZY19960414新蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
論文被拒有必要申訴嗎?求大佬幫看看。 已有1人參與
|
|
The three-dimensional flow field around a hypersonic vehicle was numerically simulated in the study. The manuscript focused on the realistic reentry plasma sheath, the electron density and temperature at the hypersonic reentry stage. It was shown that the maximal total pressure on the leeward side decreased with the angle of attack and that on the windward side increased with the angle of attack, in agreement with previous studies. The results showed that the thickness of the plasma sheath increased on the leeward side, but the electron density decreased. Since electron density is related to reduction of electromagnetic wave, so radio communication on the leeward side at a large angle of attack might overcome the communication ‘blackout’. These results might be helpful for seeking the way to eliminate ‘blackout’ at reentry stage. however, there are some flaws in the paper. The necessity of 3D simulations was not discussed. It seems that all conclusions obtained from 3D and experiments can also be drawn from 2D simulations. The three-dimensionality of the flow should play a role in determining the flow around the vehicle, which should be discussed to prove the importance of 3D simulations. Unfortunately, there is no further talk about 3D simulations, except for validating the 3D computations. One of the highlights of the study is the decreased electron density with increasing the angle of attack. The underlying physics of this event should be discussed or supposed in the paper, even though it might be still elusive. Moreover, whether this phenomenon has been found in previous 2D simulations is neither introduced nor discussed. These issues should be explored and addressed in this paper. Substantial revision following the academic standards in proper written English is necessary. For example, ‘AOA’ should be explained at the first appearance of the term. The manuscript is not recommended to publish. 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
銅蟲 (正式寫手)

新蟲 (正式寫手)
|
以上是審稿意見,1.主要問題審稿人要的就是三維對比二維的優(yōu)點在哪,為什么要用三維算流場。但是二維就算不了攻角的情況,旋轉軸對稱每個位置的流場分布都是不一樣的。我只是截取XOY比較容易分析而已,審稿專家就抓著二維也可以仿真攻角。2.確定對給出的結論分析不夠,但感覺可以進行補充。3還有就是語言問題。但是最主要的問題覺得他提出來是錯的。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
新蟲 (正式寫手)
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085600 材料與化工 295 求調劑 +9 | dream…… 2026-03-10 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 086000生物與醫(yī)藥319分求調劑 +4 | Tolkien 2026-03-07 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 315食品工程求調劑 +4 | Oreov0 2026-03-06 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 歡迎211本科同學,過A區(qū)國家線,A區(qū)非偏遠一本,交叉學科課題組 +23 | lisimayy 2026-03-04 | 37/1850 |
|
|
[考研] 083000環(huán)境科學與工程調劑 +6 | mingmingry 2026-03-09 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0817一志愿蘇州大學280復試調劑 +9 | kk扛 2026-03-07 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 293一志愿華東理工 0817化學工程與技術 調劑 +5 | fjj0912 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求0856調劑 +5 | 小力氣珂珂 2026-03-08 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博自薦 +9 | 烷基八氮- 2026-03-06 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 理學287分求調劑 +4 | 看看我. 2026-03-05 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調劑 +5 | 好好- 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學0856材料與化工,前三科206,總分283,求調劑 +7 | 26考研求調劑 2026-03-06 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京大學資源與環(huán)境專業(yè)283分求調劑 +8 | 追云?? 2026-03-04 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調劑 +10 | ounce. 2026-03-04 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 化學專業(yè)調劑 +5 | 好好好1233 2026-03-04 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 287求調劑 +3 | 看看我. 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求調劑 +7 | 邱gl 2026-03-05 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 267調劑求助 +5 | 聰少OZ 2026-03-04 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西交化工專碩288專業(yè)課93求調劑 +6 | 好運好運接接 2026-03-04 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調劑 +4 | 小賽不吃香菜 2026-03-04 | 4/200 |
|