| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2524 | 回復(fù): 8 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
zzzzzz54新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
spl是否重投,一個(gè)審稿人給了r,另一個(gè)aq,ae給了r 已有3人參與
|
||
|
The reviewing process of your paper submitted to the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is now completed. Comments from the reviewers are attached at the end of this email. (** See note below about attachments). Based on the attached set of reviews, I regret to inform you that I have to decide to REJECT the paper for publication. In summary, as pointed out by the reviewers the main drawback of this work concerns the novelty of the proposal that is not sufficiently convincing to warrant IEEE Signal Processing Letters publication. Furthermore, the paper contribution was also considered not technically detailed or clearly described in the manuscript. The evaluation experiments are not clear reported or convincing. The comparison with recent competitive solutions is considered missing in the proposal. This fact also avoids a plain examination of the contribution. Additional issues concerning the proposal description are detailed highlighted by the reviewers. Considering that the decision process for the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is BINARY (papers that need major revisions are not accepted), I regret that I cannot offer you a more positive decision at this point because we do appreciate your interest in publishing in the IEEE Signal Processing Letters. Resubmission of Previously Rejected Manuscripts: Technically, you cannot resubmit a REJECTED manuscript, as it is a REJECTED and CLOSED paper. You would therefore need to submit it as a new manuscript obtaining a new manuscript ID #. When you submit, begin a new submission and follow the submission instructions. Please include a cover letter, explaining the paper's history, previous manuscript ID #, and AE name. Please also include your "Response to Reviewers" document along with your manuscript files. Authors of Rejected manuscripts are allowed to resubmit their manuscripts only once. Manuscripts that have been rejected twice by Signal Processing Letters cannot be considered further for publication in Signal Processing Letters, and authors should understand that any encouraging reviewer or editorial comments that may accompany a second rejection should be taken as applicable to resubmission in some other venue. If you choose to submit a new version of your manuscript, you will be asked to submit supporting documents detailing how your new version addresses all of the reviewers' comments. Full details of the resubmission process can be found in the Signal Processing Society “Policy and Procedures Manual” at https://signalprocessingsociety. ... d-procedures-manual Note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, nor that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered. Also note that the original Associate Editor who managed the original peer review process is not guaranteed as well. Resubmissions are to be treated as brand new submissions without bias. Also, as a general reminder for authors, before resubmitted, please be sure to read some of the IEEE material regarding author conduct: https://journals.ieeeauthorcente ... eee-journal-author/ Specifically, regarding avoiding copyright infringement: https://journals.ieeeauthorcente ... pon-ieee-copyright/ And the improper reuse of content: https://journals.ieeeauthorcente ... ials/#citingsources If you have any questions regarding the reviews, please contact the managing Associate Editor who managed the peer review of your paper. Sincerely, Prof. Ros?ngela Coelho Associate Editor coelho@ime.eb.br Reviewer Comments: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: R - Reject (Paper Is Not Of Sufficient Quality Or Novelty To Be Published In This Transactions) Comments: Despite the forward-looking sonar image processing being a hot topic in the current underwater community, this work present several critical issues: 1) The novelty is not well-explained. The authors have to highlight better the differences concerning the current state-of-the-art. 2) Some parts of the paper are not well-explain. For example, the FLS used. The authors must provide information about the FLS images used to guarantee the research replicability. Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Moderately So Explain: 3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Not Novel Explain: The novelty of this work is not well-explained. 4. How would you rate the English usage?: Needs improvement 6. Rate the references: Satisfactory Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes Comments: (There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.) Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes Explain: 3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Novel Enough for Publication Explain: The authors improve detection performance in FLS imagery with complex gradient and low resolution by the ellipse quality evaluation. 4. How would you rate the English usage?: Satisfactory 6. Rate the references: Satisfactory 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
|
我上次一個(gè)a,一個(gè)r,編輯r。修改重投后送了新的,接受了。 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
送紅花一朵 |
兩個(gè)reviewer對(duì)創(chuàng)新性的評(píng)語太兩級(jí)化了,第一個(gè)說創(chuàng)新性沒有很好的解釋但也沒有說具體問題 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料工程085601調(diào)劑求老師收留 +9 | 強(qiáng)木木木 2026-03-07 | 11/550 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856化工原理 +5 | z2839474511 2026-03-10 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +4 | 步川酷紫123 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0857環(huán)境調(diào)劑 +5 | 熠熠_11 2026-03-10 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程307,求調(diào)劑 +7 | 我要燃燒你的夢(mèng) 2026-03-08 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 312求調(diào)劑 +5 | 陌宸希 2026-03-10 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程295求調(diào)劑,一志愿A區(qū)211 +8 | 等春來, 2026-03-06 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山東大學(xué),總分327,英語二79,有論文,有競(jìng)賽,已過四六級(jí) +3 | 木木目目1 2026-03-09 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南大化學(xué)339分求調(diào)劑,四六級(jí)已過,有比賽,有文章 +7 | Gallantzhou 2026-03-07 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理314求調(diào)劑 +4 | ( ̄~ ̄;) 2026-03-08 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 拾柒12。 2026-03-08 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿華中科大0702,數(shù)一英一,293 +4 | 小羅露一二 2026-03-07 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程317分求調(diào)劑 +9 | 6汆尼9 2026-03-07 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 322分 085600求調(diào)劑,有互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+國金及主持省級(jí)大創(chuàng)經(jīng)歷 +4 | 熊境喆 2026-03-05 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 誠求調(diào)劑,323分 有專利/科研/實(shí)習(xí)經(jīng)歷 +6 | 橙子cyx 2026-03-06 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-06 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +4 | 邱gl 2026-03-06 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
|
zbcm_zbcm 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工354調(diào)劑 +4 | Lucy-xiao 2026-03-06 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 紡織、生物、化學(xué)、材料等專業(yè) +3 | Eember. 2026-03-05 | 7/350 |
|