 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2526 | 回復: 8 | |||
zzzzzz54新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
spl是否重投，一個審稿人給了r，另一個aq，ae給了r 已有3人參與
|
|
The reviewing process of your paper submitted to the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is now completed. Comments from the reviewers are attached at the end of this email. (** See note below about attachments). Based on the attached set of reviews, I regret to inform you that I have to decide to REJECT the paper for publication. In summary, as pointed out by the reviewers the main drawback of this work concerns the novelty of the proposal that is not sufficiently convincing to warrant IEEE Signal Processing Letters publication. Furthermore, the paper contribution was also considered not technically detailed or clearly described in the manuscript. The evaluation experiments are not clear reported or convincing. The comparison with recent competitive solutions is considered missing in the proposal. This fact also avoids a plain examination of the contribution. Additional issues concerning the proposal description are detailed highlighted by the reviewers. Considering that the decision process for the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is BINARY (papers that need major revisions are not accepted), I regret that I cannot offer you a more positive decision at this point because we do appreciate your interest in publishing in the IEEE Signal Processing Letters. Resubmission of Previously Rejected Manuscripts: Technically, you cannot resubmit a REJECTED manuscript, as it is a REJECTED and CLOSED paper. You would therefore need to submit it as a new manuscript obtaining a new manuscript ID #. When you submit, begin a new submission and follow the submission instructions. Please include a cover letter, explaining the paper's history, previous manuscript ID #, and AE name. Please also include your "Response to Reviewers" document along with your manuscript files. Authors of Rejected manuscripts are allowed to resubmit their manuscripts only once. Manuscripts that have been rejected twice by Signal Processing Letters cannot be considered further for publication in Signal Processing Letters, and authors should understand that any encouraging reviewer or editorial comments that may accompany a second rejection should be taken as applicable to resubmission in some other venue. If you choose to submit a new version of your manuscript, you will be asked to submit supporting documents detailing how your new version addresses all of the reviewers' comments. Full details of the resubmission process can be found in the Signal Processing Society “Policy and Procedures Manual” at https://signalprocessingsociety. ... d-procedures-manual Note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, nor that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered. Also note that the original Associate Editor who managed the original peer review process is not guaranteed as well. Resubmissions are to be treated as brand new submissions without bias. Also, as a general reminder for authors, before resubmitted, please be sure to read some of the IEEE material regarding author conduct: https://journals.ieeeauthorcente ... eee-journal-author/ Specifically, regarding avoiding copyright infringement: https://journals.ieeeauthorcente ... pon-ieee-copyright/ And the improper reuse of content: https://journals.ieeeauthorcente ... ials/#citingsources If you have any questions regarding the reviews, please contact the managing Associate Editor who managed the peer review of your paper. Sincerely, Prof. Ros?ngela Coelho Associate Editor coelho@ime.eb.br Reviewer Comments: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: R - Reject (Paper Is Not Of Sufficient Quality Or Novelty To Be Published In This Transactions) Comments: Despite the forward-looking sonar image processing being a hot topic in the current underwater community, this work present several critical issues: 1) The novelty is not well-explained. The authors have to highlight better the differences concerning the current state-of-the-art. 2) Some parts of the paper are not well-explain. For example, the FLS used. The authors must provide information about the FLS images used to guarantee the research replicability. Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Moderately So Explain: 3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Not Novel Explain: The novelty of this work is not well-explained. 4. How would you rate the English usage?: Needs improvement 6. Rate the references: Satisfactory Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes Comments: (There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.) Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes Explain: 3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Novel Enough for Publication Explain: The authors improve detection performance in FLS imagery with complex gradient and low resolution by the ellipse quality evaluation. 4. How would you rate the English usage?: Satisfactory 6. Rate the references: Satisfactory 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
回復此樓» 猜你喜歡
化學學碩求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復
-
工科278分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
307求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復
-
315求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復
-
314求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
材料301分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復
-
一志愿中科大材料與化工。353分能調(diào)劑到哪？
已經(jīng)有10人回復
-
285求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復
-
290 材料與化工求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復
-
一志愿河海大學085900土木水利專碩279求調(diào)劑不挑專業(yè)
已經(jīng)有7人回復
fchest
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 614.9
- 散金: 4
- 帖子: 121
- 在線: 13.4小時
- 蟲號: 23492735
- 注冊: 2020-09-07
- 專業(yè): 計算機應用技術
zzzzzz542樓2022-06-01 23:00:50
3樓2022-06-01 23:22:15
zzzzzz54
新蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 85.8
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 35
- 在線: 10.4小時
- 蟲號: 27369501
- 注冊: 2021-09-23
- 專業(yè): 計算機網(wǎng)絡
4樓2022-06-02 00:38:43
zzzzzz54
新蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 85.8
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 35
- 在線: 10.4小時
- 蟲號: 27369501
- 注冊: 2021-09-23
- 專業(yè): 計算機網(wǎng)絡
5樓2022-06-02 00:40:57
6樓2022-06-02 06:57:50
zzzzzz54
新蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 85.8
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 35
- 在線: 10.4小時
- 蟲號: 27369501
- 注冊: 2021-09-23
- 專業(yè): 計算機網(wǎng)絡
7樓2022-06-02 08:29:30
8樓2022-06-03 23:50:21
9樓2022-06-04 11:18:25
相關版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 zzzzzz54 的主題更新
| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 315求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小羊小羊_ 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[文學芳草園] 伙伴們，祝我生日快樂吧 +8 | myrtle 2026-03-10 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 420求調(diào)劑 +4 | 莫向外求11 2026-03-10 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 研究生招生 +3 | 徐海濤11 2026-03-10 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑0856材料化工 +9 | z2839474511 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學材料與化工296分求調(diào)劑 +15 | 稻妻小編 2026-03-09 | 17/850 |
|
|
|
[考研]
一志愿天津大學材料與化工275求調(diào)劑
 10+5
|
穿只靴子 2026-03-07 | 22/1100 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +4 | 步川酷紫123 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿浙江大學0856材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +3 | yansheng@211 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +5 | 調(diào)劑的考研學生 2026-03-09 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑自薦信，初試323 +6 | 李白26 2026-03-07 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328，0703考生求調(diào)劑，一志愿為東北師范大學 +3 | 觀素律 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +8 | Gale1314 2026-03-06 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 310 070300化學求調(diào)劑 +4 | 撲風鈴的貓 2026-03-08 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南大化學339分求調(diào)劑，四六級已過，有比賽，有文章 +7 | Gallantzhou 2026-03-07 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 296求調(diào)劑 +4 | Xinyu Wu311 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考博] 26申博自薦 +9 | 烷基八氮- 2026-03-06 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +8 | Trying] 2026-03-06 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 進入個人成果庫好難，一下午都沒進去 +6 | mi_dilee 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學求調(diào)劑292分 +3 | 打烊eee 2026-03-07 | 3/150 |
|