| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 961 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者redcolumn將贈送您 50 個金幣 | |||
[求助]
大修意見回復(fù)修改和老師交流后困惑 已有2人參與
|
|||
|
reviewer#1 however, due to poor presentation skills, this paper is disorganized to verify the total research processes including the research designs, the data collections, the prediction modeling, and the analyses of the prediction results. authors require some major revisions. secondly, for section 1, the author should provide the comments of the cited papers after introducing each relevant work. what readers require is, by convinced literature review, to understand the clear thinking/consideration why the proposed approach can reach more convinced results. this is the very contribution from authors. in addition, authors also should provide more sufficient critical literature review to indicate the drawbacks of existed approaches, then, well define the main stream of research direction, how did those previous studies perform? employ which methodologies? which problem still requires to be solved? why is the proposed approach suitable to be used to solve the critical problem? we need more convinced literature reviews to indicate clearly the state-the-art development. 對于前半部分評論,我認(rèn)為是引用文獻(xiàn)的評論沒有很直觀的表達(dá)。所以對引用文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行了增加,并最后段落結(jié)尾說明了目前關(guān)于這個話題得到的結(jié)論不統(tǒng)一。 后半部分評論,我認(rèn)為是現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)不足以說明目前方法的不足(approaches),要增加文獻(xiàn)說明針對這個問題為什么可以用這個模型(why is the proposed approach suitable to be used to solve the critical problem?)所以對本文展開研究的理論模型和使用的方法這兩部分進(jìn)行了對應(yīng)的文獻(xiàn)擴(kuò)充。 昨天和老師交流過之后,他認(rèn)為審稿人意見表明他覺得我introduction寫的不好,他沒真切看到我的貢獻(xiàn)。認(rèn)為我應(yīng)該把現(xiàn)有introduction中的幾段話說明白(前半部分應(yīng)該對我引用的文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行深入解讀,結(jié)論表明了什么,不僅是說明作者做了什么,得出來什么結(jié)論,而且我需要對這些文獻(xiàn)再多加描述,不然會讓審稿人認(rèn)為這些文獻(xiàn)我并沒有仔細(xì)看過的感覺;后半部分認(rèn)為我要說明現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)的進(jìn)展,不足(結(jié)論不統(tǒng)一等,分析不透徹等,數(shù)據(jù)不合理等)我的研究的亮點(diǎn),介紹一下我的introduction做了什么)。認(rèn)為approaches不是方法的問題,我不應(yīng)該從之前introduction中未寫的模型和方法的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)著手來回答這個問題。 我現(xiàn)在的困惑是, 1這兩部分評論是否合起來回復(fù)會好一些?因?yàn)槲墨I(xiàn)做了什么,結(jié)論的解讀直接一般就延展出了不足,進(jìn)而是本研究的貢獻(xiàn)。 2我認(rèn)為除了老師提到的把之前introduction的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)說明白(包括結(jié)論解讀和現(xiàn)有不足,本文亮點(diǎn))之后,還是應(yīng)該把本文使用模型和方法的文獻(xiàn)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充(即我原先回復(fù)時的補(bǔ)充) 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
超級版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 工科278分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 周慢熱啊 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 277求調(diào)劑 +3 | anchor17 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +3 | 負(fù)心者當(dāng)誅 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考博] 售SCI一區(qū)T0P文章,我:8.O.5.5.1.O.5.4,科目齊全,可+急 +3 | 7x4iz20zqa 2026-03-11 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085602化工求調(diào)劑 +7 | 董boxing 2026-03-10 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0817學(xué)碩華東區(qū)求調(diào)劑 +3 | 30660438 2026-03-08 | 3/150 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 木蟲好像不熱鬧了,是不是? +4 | 偏振片 2026-03-10 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 337求調(diào)劑 +3 | 睡醒,。 2026-03-09 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | squirtle11 2026-03-07 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料與化工290求調(diào)劑 +7 | Nebulala 2026-03-08 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿江南大學(xué),食品科學(xué)與工程,總分,320 +3 | yyyyyukino 2026-03-07 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 拾柒12。 2026-03-08 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 347求調(diào)劑 +4 | 浮云滿足 2026-03-07 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿華中科大0702,數(shù)一英一,293 +4 | 小羅露一二 2026-03-07 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料化工求調(diào)劑 +7 | 博斯特525 2026-03-06 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)(0805)338 求調(diào)劑 +7 | xiaokang3286 2026-03-07 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大071000分?jǐn)?shù)282求調(diào)劑 +3 | 研研顏 2026-03-05 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 化學(xué)305分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 0703楊悅305分 2026-03-05 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑推薦 +4 | 微辣不吃 2026-03-06 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +4 | 邱gl 2026-03-06 | 4/200 |
|