| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5695 | 回復(fù): 11 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) ESEPI ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
|||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
用戶注銷 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +5 | 哇塞王帥 2026-03-03 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 化學(xué) 0703求調(diào)劑 總分293 一志愿211 +3 | 土土小蟲 2026-03-03 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué) 學(xué)碩 理工科均可 不區(qū)分研究方向 總分279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1一11 2026-03-03 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境調(diào)劑 +8 | chenhanheng 2026-03-02 | 8/400 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 請(qǐng)問(wèn)大家,研究風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與應(yīng)對(duì)措施那里, 大家都怎么寫呢 ? +3 | cauasen 2026-03-02 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 266材料化工求調(diào)劑 +3 | 哇塞王帥 2026-03-03 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
glwshine 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 26考研報(bào)考西工大材料308分求調(diào)劑 +4 | weizhong123 2026-03-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
材料工程專碩283求調(diào)劑
5+8
|
,!? 2026-03-02 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研]
材料325求調(diào)劑
30+3
|
mariusuki 2026-03-02 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | north, 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 化工335求調(diào)劑 +5 | 摸摸貓貓頭 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
好好好1233 2026-02-28 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +10 | 人間唯你是清歡 2026-02-28 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 0856化工專碩求調(diào)劑 +15 | 董boxing 2026-03-01 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +5 | 今夏不夏 2026-03-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +7 | yhk_819 2026-02-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +3 | L-xin? 2026-03-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 313求調(diào)劑 +3 | 水流年lc 2026-02-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[高分子] 求環(huán)氧樹脂研發(fā)1名 +3 | 孫xc 2026-02-25 | 11/550 |
|