| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5693 | 回復(fù): 11 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個 ESEPI ,點擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
|||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
新蟲 (初入文壇)
用戶注銷 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
What they were looking for is an assistant, unlike the regular European PhD positions affiliated to a fixed project, so they didn't tell much about the info of their research projects. They asked for a research proposal but didn't pay much attention to discuss it while the direction of my master thesis is actually not within their research fields. |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[論文投稿]
EST拒稿重投
5+3
|
15102603076 2026-03-02 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 接收調(diào)劑 +15 | 津萌津萌 2026-03-02 | 23/1150 |
|
|
[考研] 學(xué)碩材料275調(diào)劑 +4 | 路三三 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 化工專碩調(diào)劑 +4 | 利好利好. 2026-03-03 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 264求調(diào)劑 +6 | 26調(diào)劑 2026-03-03 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 江蘇省農(nóng)科院招調(diào)劑1名 +5 | Qwertyuop 2026-03-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +10 | 簡單點0 2026-03-02 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +3 | 滿天星11_22 2026-03-02 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +6 | 天下熯 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 281電子信息求調(diào)劑 +3 | jhtfeybgj 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 080500材料科學(xué)與工程 +4 | 202114020319 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料調(diào)劑 +5 | 沿岸有貝殼OUC 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 261求調(diào)劑 +3 | 陸lh 2026-03-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請] 此成果不能導(dǎo)入原因:元數(shù)據(jù)必填信息不完整,可 進(jìn)行補充。 +4 | Kittylucky 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 化工專碩342,一志愿大連理工大學(xué),求調(diào)劑 +6 | kyf化工 2026-02-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +3 | dua1 2026-03-01 | 4/200 |
|
|
[基金申請] 成果系統(tǒng)訪問量大,請一小時后再嘗試。---NSFC啥時候好哦,已經(jīng)兩天這樣了 +4 | NSFC2026我來了 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 博士自薦 +7 | 科研狗111 2026-02-26 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +6 | 亭亭亭01 2026-03-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
|
LYidhsjabdj 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|