| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5740 | 回復(fù): 11 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) ESEPI ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
|||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
|
Hug first. What they really pushed me down isn't the questions they ask but the reactions they made to my answers. Their reactions look very skeptical about everything I said. Sometimes they even slightly laughed conveying a subtle feeling like contempt (but maybe I misunderstood or over-interpreted), but overall they didn't give any positive response. |
用戶注銷(xiāo) (正式寫(xiě)手)
新蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
新蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085602化工求調(diào)劑 +7 | 董boxing 2026-03-10 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 282分材料專業(yè)求調(diào)劑院校 +15 | 楓橋ZL 2026-03-09 | 21/1050 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境調(diào)劑 +5 | 曉看天暮看云 2026-03-09 | 5/250 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 2026級(jí)碩士研究生招生/調(diào)劑 +4 | lbj6746988 2026-03-03 | 7/350 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 2026級(jí)碩士研究生招生/調(diào)劑 +3 | 知足常樂(lè)的樂(lè) 2026-03-06 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | 辛仁豆腐 2026-03-08 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 313求調(diào)劑 +4 | Yyt楊1 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 293一志愿華東理工 0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù) 調(diào)劑 +5 | fjj0912 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑,總分309分,一志愿華南師范 +3 | 花與葉@ 2026-03-08 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理314求調(diào)劑 +4 | ( ̄~ ̄;) 2026-03-08 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +7 | ounce. 2026-03-05 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大071000分?jǐn)?shù)282求調(diào)劑 +3 | 研研顏 2026-03-05 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)290求調(diào)劑 +3 | 兩顆 西柚 2026-03-07 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0307化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +6 | 0ok0k 2026-03-07 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +4 | 52hz~~ 2026-03-05 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 08工科求調(diào)劑 +3 | 隆LLL 2026-03-06 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +3 | 馳光絕景 2026-03-04 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工354調(diào)劑 +4 | Lucy-xiao 2026-03-06 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 274環(huán)境工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 扶柳盈江 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿985材料與化工 326分求調(diào)劑 +3 | Hz795795 2026-03-04 | 3/150 |
|