| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5745 | 回復: 11 | ||
| 本帖產生 1 個 ESEPI ,點擊這里進行查看 | ||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
|
I didn't avoid my drawbacks and, instead, I made a full explanation in my motivation letter and also I explained to them again in the interview. Asking questions about my thesis was not surprising but very common. The reason I confused is that they just paid attention to the thesis. I have attended a few interviews and this is the only one sticking on one aspect rather than taking various aspects into account. |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
百度網(wǎng)盤 |
360云盤 |
千易網(wǎng)盤 |
華為網(wǎng)盤
在新窗口頁面中打開自己喜歡的網(wǎng)盤網(wǎng)站,將文件上傳后,然后將下載鏈接復制到帖子內容中就可以了。 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 復試調劑 +3 | Copy267 2026-03-10 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 420求調劑 +4 | 莫向外求11 2026-03-10 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 標題:撿漏預警|08工科/09農學調劑!英語要求低,過線即有機會! +9 | 馬超放煙花 2026-03-07 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] (081700)化學工程與技術-298分求調劑 +9 | 11啦啦啦 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 0817化學工程319求調劑 +8 | lv945 2026-03-08 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調劑0856材料化工 +9 | z2839474511 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調劑,307分 +12 | 張泳銘1 2026-03-09 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 086000生物與醫(yī)藥319分求調劑 +4 | Tolkien 2026-03-07 | 8/400 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 木蟲好像不熱鬧了,是不是? +4 | 偏振片 2026-03-10 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工,一志愿廣州985,求調劑 +15 | qqyyaill 2026-03-05 | 15/750 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 2026級碩士研究生招生/調劑 +3 | 知足常樂的樂 2026-03-06 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調劑 +3 | 辛仁豆腐 2026-03-08 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 269求調劑 +3 | 朔朔話 2026-03-08 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調劑(0703)一志愿東北大學 +5 | 好好- 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程專業(yè),初試305,均過國家A區(qū)線 +7 | 卡卡來了@ 2026-03-07 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 322分 085600求調劑,有互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+國金及主持省級大創(chuàng)經歷 +4 | 熊境喆 2026-03-05 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 化學290求調劑 +3 | 兩顆 西柚 2026-03-07 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武漢理工085601,初試301分,請問能調劑到湖北嗎 +3 | 肖yang 2026-03-06 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑推薦 +4 | 微辣不吃 2026-03-06 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考博] 2026申博自薦 六級440電催化方向 +4 | 櫻落成影花成雙 2026-03-05 | 4/200 |
|