| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5696 | 回復(fù): 11 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) ESEPI ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿(mǎn)足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
|||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)

用戶(hù)注銷(xiāo) (正式寫(xiě)手)
新蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
新蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +5 | 哇塞王帥 2026-03-03 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0854總分272 +5 | 打小就是老實(shí)人 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +4 | 杰尼龜aaa 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 學(xué)碩材料275調(diào)劑 +4 | 路三三 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
材料270求調(diào)劑
6+6
|
Eiiiio 2026-03-01 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)085600 319分 材料與化工 金屬方向 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 青科11 2026-03-02 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境工程專(zhuān)碩307求調(diào)劑 +3 | ccc! 2026-03-03 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料類(lèi)考研調(diào)劑 +6 | gemmgemm 2026-03-01 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +4 | wxz2 2026-03-03 | 5/250 |
|
|
[論文投稿]
通訊作者寫(xiě)誰(shuí),問(wèn)題是你意想不到的問(wèn)題
15+3
|
阿爾法啊 2026-03-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 考研復(fù)試調(diào)劑,過(guò)國(guó)家線的同學(xué)都可報(bào)名 +7 | 黑!在干嘛 2026-02-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 271求調(diào)劑 +4 | Ricardo1113 2026-03-02 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 272求調(diào)劑 +9 | 材紫有化 2026-02-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +5 | 學(xué)材料的點(diǎn) 2026-03-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 306分材料調(diào)劑 +5 | chuanzhu川燭 2026-03-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 261求調(diào)劑 +3 | 陸lh 2026-03-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大材料學(xué)碩298分,求調(diào)劑 +6 | wsl111 2026-03-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
|
15779376950 2026-03-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 317一志愿華南理工電氣工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | Soliloquy_Q 2026-02-28 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研]
|
LYidhsjabdj 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|