| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5696 | 回復(fù): 11 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) ESEPI ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
|||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
用戶注銷 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +5 | 哇塞王帥 2026-03-03 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0854總分272 +5 | 打小就是老實(shí)人 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué) 0703求調(diào)劑 總分293 一志愿211 +3 | 土土小蟲 2026-03-03 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請]
|
xhuama 2026-03-02 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 求博導(dǎo) +3 | 愛讀書的小帥 2026-02-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料工程,初試313調(diào)劑 +7 | 賣個(gè)關(guān)子吧 2026-03-03 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +3 | 人間唯你是清歡 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中科大能動(dòng)297求調(diào)劑,本科川大 +3 | 邵11 2026-03-03 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 化工270求調(diào)劑 +10 | 什么名字qwq 2026-03-02 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +6 | 好運(yùn)連綿不絕 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +5 | kkcoco25 2026-03-02 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 080500材料科學(xué)與工程 +4 | 202114020319 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料求調(diào)劑 +12 | hyf hyf hyf 2026-02-28 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 材料284求調(diào)劑,一志愿鄭州大學(xué)英一數(shù)二專碩 +15 | 想上岸的土撥鼠 2026-02-28 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +3 | 恒順自然 2026-03-02 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 熬夜的貓頭鷹 2026-03-02 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +3 | 熊境喆 2026-03-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 291分工科求調(diào)劑 +9 | science餓餓 2026-03-01 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 313求調(diào)劑 +3 | 水流年lc 2026-02-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +3 | 簡木ChuFront 2026-02-28 | 3/150 |
|