| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5699 | 回復(fù): 11 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) ESEPI ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
|||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
用戶注銷 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085600 材料與化工 298 +8 | 小西笑嘻嘻 2026-03-03 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0854總分272 +5 | 打小就是老實(shí)人 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境調(diào)劑 +8 | chenhanheng 2026-03-02 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +7 | 張張張張oo 2026-03-03 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調(diào)劑 +8 | 路lyh123 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料328求調(diào)劑 +4 | 一個(gè)蘿卜02 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿東北大學(xué)化學(xué)314分求調(diào)劑 +5 | lr1212.. 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)085600 319分 材料與化工 金屬方向 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 青科11 2026-03-02 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +6 | 天下熯 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +6 | 好運(yùn)連綿不絕 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
材料325求調(diào)劑
30+3
|
mariusuki 2026-03-02 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | north, 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +11 | yunziaaaaa 2026-03-01 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +7 | 明遠(yuǎn)求學(xué) 2026-03-01 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考博] 26超級電容器申博 +3 | dhdjdjend 2026-02-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +8 | 19171856320 2026-02-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +3 | aaadim 2026-03-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +9 | 材料專碩調(diào)劑; 2026-02-28 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研]
|
LYidhsjabdj 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +9 | 南迦720 2026-02-28 | 10/500 |
|