 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2520 | 回復(fù): 8 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
zzzzzz54新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
spl是否重投，一個審稿人給了r，另一個aq，ae給了r 已有3人參與
|
||
|
The reviewing process of your paper submitted to the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is now completed. Comments from the reviewers are attached at the end of this email. (** See note below about attachments). Based on the attached set of reviews, I regret to inform you that I have to decide to REJECT the paper for publication. In summary, as pointed out by the reviewers the main drawback of this work concerns the novelty of the proposal that is not sufficiently convincing to warrant IEEE Signal Processing Letters publication. Furthermore, the paper contribution was also considered not technically detailed or clearly described in the manuscript. The evaluation experiments are not clear reported or convincing. The comparison with recent competitive solutions is considered missing in the proposal. This fact also avoids a plain examination of the contribution. Additional issues concerning the proposal description are detailed highlighted by the reviewers. Considering that the decision process for the IEEE Signal Processing Letters is BINARY (papers that need major revisions are not accepted), I regret that I cannot offer you a more positive decision at this point because we do appreciate your interest in publishing in the IEEE Signal Processing Letters. Resubmission of Previously Rejected Manuscripts: Technically, you cannot resubmit a REJECTED manuscript, as it is a REJECTED and CLOSED paper. You would therefore need to submit it as a new manuscript obtaining a new manuscript ID #. When you submit, begin a new submission and follow the submission instructions. Please include a cover letter, explaining the paper's history, previous manuscript ID #, and AE name. Please also include your "Response to Reviewers" document along with your manuscript files. Authors of Rejected manuscripts are allowed to resubmit their manuscripts only once. Manuscripts that have been rejected twice by Signal Processing Letters cannot be considered further for publication in Signal Processing Letters, and authors should understand that any encouraging reviewer or editorial comments that may accompany a second rejection should be taken as applicable to resubmission in some other venue. If you choose to submit a new version of your manuscript, you will be asked to submit supporting documents detailing how your new version addresses all of the reviewers' comments. Full details of the resubmission process can be found in the Signal Processing Society “Policy and Procedures Manual” at https://signalprocessingsociety. ... d-procedures-manual Note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, nor that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is rendered. Also note that the original Associate Editor who managed the original peer review process is not guaranteed as well. Resubmissions are to be treated as brand new submissions without bias. Also, as a general reminder for authors, before resubmitted, please be sure to read some of the IEEE material regarding author conduct: https://journals.ieeeauthorcente ... eee-journal-author/ Specifically, regarding avoiding copyright infringement: https://journals.ieeeauthorcente ... pon-ieee-copyright/ And the improper reuse of content: https://journals.ieeeauthorcente ... ials/#citingsources If you have any questions regarding the reviews, please contact the managing Associate Editor who managed the peer review of your paper. Sincerely, Prof. Ros?ngela Coelho Associate Editor coelho@ime.eb.br Reviewer Comments: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: R - Reject (Paper Is Not Of Sufficient Quality Or Novelty To Be Published In This Transactions) Comments: Despite the forward-looking sonar image processing being a hot topic in the current underwater community, this work present several critical issues: 1) The novelty is not well-explained. The authors have to highlight better the differences concerning the current state-of-the-art. 2) Some parts of the paper are not well-explain. For example, the FLS used. The authors must provide information about the FLS images used to guarantee the research replicability. Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Moderately So Explain: 3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Not Novel Explain: The novelty of this work is not well-explained. 4. How would you rate the English usage?: Needs improvement 6. Rate the references: Satisfactory Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: AQ - Publish In Minor, Required Changes Comments: (There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.) Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this transaction?: Yes 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes Explain: 3. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Novel Enough for Publication Explain: The authors improve detection performance in FLS imagery with complex gradient and low resolution by the ellipse quality evaluation. 4. How would you rate the English usage?: Satisfactory 6. Rate the references: Satisfactory 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
290求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
工科278分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
考研一志愿長安大學(xué)材料與化工309分請求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
304求調(diào)劑（085602一志愿985）
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
0856材料與化工309分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
282分材料專業(yè)求調(diào)劑院校
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
-
材料工程085601調(diào)劑求老師收留
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
化工學(xué)碩306求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
308求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
-
314求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
★
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個紅包，謝謝回帖
小木蟲: 金幣+0.5, 給個紅包，謝謝回帖
|
我上次一個a，一個r，編輯r。修改重投后送了新的，接受了。 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
zzzzzz543樓2022-06-01 23:22:15
fchest
鐵蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 614.9
- 散金: 4
- 帖子: 121
- 在線: 13.4小時
- 蟲號: 23492735
- 注冊: 2020-09-07
- 專業(yè): 計算機(jī)應(yīng)用技術(shù)
2樓2022-06-01 23:00:50
zzzzzz54
新蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 85.8
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 35
- 在線: 10.4小時
- 蟲號: 27369501
- 注冊: 2021-09-23
- 專業(yè): 計算機(jī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)
4樓2022-06-02 00:38:43
zzzzzz54
新蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 85.8
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 35
- 在線: 10.4小時
- 蟲號: 27369501
- 注冊: 2021-09-23
- 專業(yè): 計算機(jī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)
5樓2022-06-02 00:40:57
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 標(biāo)題:撿漏預(yù)警|08工科/09農(nóng)學(xué)調(diào)劑!英語要求低，過線即有機(jī)會! +8 | 馬超放煙花 2026-03-07 | 13/650 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工296分求調(diào)劑 +15 | 稻妻小編 2026-03-09 | 17/850 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中科大材料與化工。353分能調(diào)劑到哪？ +5 | MayUxw1 2026-03-08 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +3 | 莫xiao 2026-03-10 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 哈工大材料324求調(diào)劑 +6 | 閆旭東 2026-03-10 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +6 | 超級伊昂大王 2026-03-10 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考博] 26申博求助 +3 | 跳躍餅干 2026-03-10 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)，英一數(shù)二305分求調(diào)劑，四六級已過 +7 | 小小番的茄 2026-03-09 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天大化工（085600）調(diào)劑總分338 +5 | 蔡大美女 2026-03-09 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 數(shù)二英二309分請求調(diào)劑 +3 | dtdxzxx 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +4 | 很老實(shí)人 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 293一志愿華東理工 0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù) 調(diào)劑 +5 | fjj0912 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求0856調(diào)劑 +5 | 小力氣珂珂 2026-03-08 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理314求調(diào)劑 +4 | （￣～￣;） 2026-03-08 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[教師之家] 交大前校長王樹國：現(xiàn)在最先進(jìn)的科技并不在大學(xué)實(shí)驗(yàn)室，而是在企業(yè)研究院 +4 | zju2000 2026-03-08 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +8 | Trying] 2026-03-06 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 進(jìn)入個人成果庫好難，一下午都沒進(jìn)去 +6 | mi_dilee 2026-03-05 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +5 | 一二LV 2026-03-07 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 2026調(diào)劑】考試A區(qū)0703化學(xué)類323分 誠求接收 +3 | 卷柏卷柏 2026-03-05 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +3 | 林小星發(fā)大財 2026-03-05 | 5/250 |
|