| 23 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1039 | 回復(fù): 22 | |||||
BayesInter專家顧問 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
審稿意見回來后,如何處理不合理的返修意見?
|
||||
|
我之前投了運(yùn)籌優(yōu)化領(lǐng)域的一個期刊ejor,第一輪審稿意見回來后,有三個專家,我按照他們的意見做了相應(yīng)的修改并提交了回去,現(xiàn)在結(jié)果又回來了,第二和三個審稿人的意見是可以接收了。但是第一個審稿人reviewer 1又提出了兩個意見,這兩個意見我認(rèn)為是不能改的,我個人認(rèn)為是reviewer 1沒正確理解文章所做出的不合理意見。然后主編看到這種情況,就有了以下的決定。 主編: As you can see from the reports enclosed, the referees hold conflicting views on your paper. In these circumstances, it has been decided that your paper should be reconsidered for publication in the EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH if you will revise it to meet the enclosed referees' comments. (You may wish to argue that some comments are invalid). The most critical comments from Reviewer #1 made me doubt whether I should reconsider your paper, so I need convincing arguments from you and a thorough revision to counterbalance the critical comments. When resubmitting the revised paper, please provide your answers to the referees, separately for each referee. Please also ensure that you have cited recent and relevant publications in EJOR and other OR journals. I am most grateful for your interest and hope that you will not be deterred from resubmitting this paper in the very near future. You are advised to revise and resubmit your manuscript by the Mar 09, 2026. After this time the review process of this submission will be terminated, by withdrawing your paper from the Editorial Manager, and the revised paper will have to be submitted as a new submission. Reviewer #2: All my comments have been suitably addressed. I recommend that this paper be accepted in its present version. I congratulate the authors on a very interesting paper with a solid contribution. Reviewer #3: Thank you for your careful and meticulous revision. In this revision, I find that the manuscript has fully responded to the reviewer comments from the first round. The writing and flow has been substantially improved, and the motivations, contributions, literature review, and conclusions were carefully revised. The parameter settings for the case studies have also been sufficiently justified, and I appreciate the additional figures and plots to help the audience understand the results. The quality of the article has been substantially improved after addressing all the comments from the reviewers. I have no remaining requests for revision, and I appreciate your thorough and professional response. Good luck with your future research. Reviewer #1: Thanks for the efforts that the authors have put into revising the manuscript. However, I feel that my earlier concerns have not been fully addressed. And in my view, the current version has not yet reached the standard required for publication in EJOR. Below, I outline the major points that still need attention. 意見1:。。。。。。 意見2:。。。。。。意見1和2我就不詳細(xì)列出來了,因?yàn)樯婕熬唧w的文章內(nèi)容。 Overall, I like the method proposed by the authors and I can see the value, however, I find that both the depth of analysis and the clarity of presentation still require substantial improvement. 現(xiàn)在我的可選行動方案是: (1) 我不會再修改了,但是給主編發(fā)個郵件,解釋Reviewer #1的兩個個人認(rèn)為不合理的意見,然后改投另一個期刊。 (2) 我不可能再大修了,但會做一些句子連貫上的小修,然后在Response letter寫出個人認(rèn)為的修改意見的不合理之處,然后再重新提交ejor,我估計(jì)會不被接受,所以這時(shí)候是不是系統(tǒng)上只有這一次新的submission的拒絕記錄(如果不被接受)?因?yàn)橹暗膕ubmission和Reviewer2和3的意見都被刪除了? 如果我采取方案2,然后被拒絕后再去投其它omaga一類的期刊會不會有什么影響? 謝謝~ |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+1/156
+2/82
+1/82
+1/32
+1/29
+1/26
+1/25
+1/21
+1/16
+1/15
+1/12
+1/8
+1/7
+1/6
+1/5
+1/4
+1/2
+1/2
+1/1
+1/1
專家顧問 (正式寫手)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +12 |
|
不積極認(rèn)真回應(yīng)審稿人1的問題,很大幾率編輯不會接收。建議以充分的文獻(xiàn)調(diào)研和數(shù)據(jù)支撐反駁審稿人1意見,一般性的回復(fù)作用不大。 發(fā)自小木蟲手機(jī)客戶端 |
專家顧問 (正式寫手)
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +12 |
| 23 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 【求調(diào)劑】293分環(huán)境工程求調(diào)劑材料/化工,服從調(diào)劑,抗壓能力強(qiáng)! +8 | xiiiia 2026-03-04 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +3 | Bahati 2026-03-05 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 264求調(diào)劑 +8 | 26調(diào)劑 2026-03-03 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +8 | 一個學(xué)習(xí)者 2026-03-04 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 085600 材料與化工 298 +14 | 小西笑嘻嘻 2026-03-03 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +6 | 等春來, 2026-03-04 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
085600 英一數(shù)二272求調(diào)劑
5+6
|
vida_a 2026-03-01 | 47/2350 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博-目前4篇SCI一作 +3 | chen_2024 2026-03-02 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程269求調(diào)劑 +7 | 白刺玫 2026-03-02 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境調(diào)劑 +8 | chenhanheng 2026-03-02 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 化工專碩調(diào)劑 +4 | 利好利好. 2026-03-03 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 江蘇省農(nóng)科院招調(diào)劑1名 +5 | Qwertyuop 2026-03-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +5 | 13853210211 2026-03-02 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +7 | 明遠(yuǎn)求學(xué) 2026-03-01 | 7/350 |
|
|
[基金申請] 成果系統(tǒng)訪問量大,請一小時(shí)后再嘗試。---NSFC啥時(shí)候好哦,已經(jīng)兩天這樣了 +4 | NSFC2026我來了 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +3 | aaadim 2026-03-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料求調(diào)劑 +4 | 麻辣魷魚 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +3 | 簡木ChuFront 2026-02-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
LYidhsjabdj 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +4 | 73372112 2026-02-28 | 6/300 |
|