| 查看: 3104 | 回復(fù): 10 | |||
910803339新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
sci大修審稿人的意見,錄取概率多大? 已有8人參與
|
||
|
Reviewer #1: A cross-sectional study that evaluates whether there is a positive association between BMI and kidney stone disease in diabetic population by using the NHANES data. My comments are listed below: 1. Although the manuscript has been written in good English, there are still some spelling and punctuation errors (i.e., with Kidney stones..., Then We separated... , "with an older age" instead of "a larger age" on line 163, etc.) to be corrected. 2. The lines have been numbered, which facilitates to locate a comment, but it would be better if the pages are also numbered. 3. The abbreviations SII, PIR, BMI should be written openly when they are first used in the Abstract. 4. Line 148: It is not written how the patients have been divided into three groups according to their BMI values. Could you please give the cut-off values for each group? 5. Line 165: Does "triplets of age" mean grouped by three consecutive ages? If yes, I wonder why the authors have not used it as a continuous variable. 6. Lines 179-181: The authors mentioned that the correlation between BMI and kidney stones was much stronger in the study of Feng et al. (reference #11). However, they have concluded that the individuals with a BMI of greater than 30 were more strongly connected with kidney stone. Do the authors have an explanation for this? Moreover, the results of three-group interaction tests can be given in a separate table. 7. Maybe the subtitle "The association between BMI and kidney stones" can be changed as "Multivariate analysis of BMI and kidney stones" as the previous subtitle mentioned about the univariate analysis. 8. The tables have been located on separate pages which makes it difficult to read and have a general insight. Reviewer #2: 1. The English language in this search should be revised specifically the link between phrases. 2. In this study, the author did not refer to the type of diabetes (type I or type II), as the pathogenesis and the treatment options are different, and the author did not mention the level of the blood sugar. 3. Abbreviations should be mentioned at the beginning of the text as many are not universal, such as PIR (poverty income rate) 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
木蟲 (著名寫手)

木蟲 (正式寫手)
超新星

鐵蟲 (初入文壇)

版主 (知名作家)
木蟲青春動力委員長
新蟲 (小有名氣)
新蟲 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
新蟲 (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料工程085601調(diào)劑求老師收留 +8 | 強木木木 2026-03-07 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[基金申請] 提交后的基金本子,已讓學(xué)校撤回了,可否換口子提交 +3 | dut_pfx 2026-03-10 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +3 | Ffff03 2026-03-10 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博求助 +3 | 跳躍餅干 2026-03-10 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 一志愿蘇州大學(xué),0856化工323分 | 本科應(yīng)化 | 有專利/競賽/科研助手經(jīng)歷 | +7 | 橙子cyx 2026-03-06 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研]
|
likeihood 2026-03-06 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿清華深研院材料專碩294分,專業(yè)課111分,本科中南大學(xué)材料,有六級,有工作經(jīng)驗 +4 | H14528 2026-03-04 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 化工284求調(diào)劑 +12 | 小黑想變白 2026-03-07 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 家人們 調(diào)劑不迷路 看這里 +8 | likeihood 2026-03-09 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 337求調(diào)劑 +3 | 睡醒,。 2026-03-09 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑085600材料與化工 +13 | Daunrin 2026-03-07 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +8 | Trying] 2026-03-06 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211 化學(xué)305分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 0703楊悅305分 2026-03-05 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 267化工調(diào)劑求助 +7 | 聰少OZ 2026-03-04 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-05 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考博] 2026年博士名額撿漏 +4 | 科研ya 2026-03-04 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 大爆炸難民 2026-03-06 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +3 | 林小星發(fā)大財 2026-03-05 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 293分求調(diào)劑 +3 | SivanNano. 2026-03-05 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西交化工專碩288專業(yè)課93求調(diào)劑 +6 | 好運好運接接 2026-03-04 | 6/300 |
|