| 24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜 |
| 2 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 472 | 回復(fù): 1 | |||
[交流]
大修意見困惑,求指教 已有1人參與
|
|
reviewer#1 however, due to poor presentation skills, this paper is disorganized to verify the total research processes including the research designs, the data collections, the prediction modeling, and the analyses of the prediction results. authors require some major revisions. secondly, for section 1, the author should provide the comments of the cited papers after introducing each relevant work. what readers require is, by convinced literature review, to understand the clear thinking/consideration why the proposed approach can reach more convinced results. this is the very contribution from authors. in addition, authors also should provide more sufficient critical literature review to indicate the drawbacks of existed approaches, then, well define the main stream of research direction, how did those previous studies perform? employ which methodologies? which problem still requires to be solved? why is the proposed approach suitable to be used to solve the critical problem? we need more convinced literature reviews to indicate clearly the state-the-art development. 對(duì)于前半部分評(píng)論,我認(rèn)為是引用文獻(xiàn)的評(píng)論沒有很直觀的表達(dá)。所以對(duì)引用文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行了增加,并最后段落結(jié)尾說明了目前關(guān)于這個(gè)話題得到的結(jié)論不統(tǒng)一。 后半部分評(píng)論,我認(rèn)為是現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)不足以說明目前方法的不足(approaches),要增加文獻(xiàn)說明針對(duì)這個(gè)問題為什么可以用這個(gè)模型(why is the proposed approach suitable to be used to solve the critical problem?)所以對(duì)本文展開研究的理論模型和使用的方法這兩部分進(jìn)行了對(duì)應(yīng)的文獻(xiàn)擴(kuò)充。 昨天和老師交流過之后,他認(rèn)為審稿人意見表明他覺得我introduction寫的不好,他沒真切看到我的貢獻(xiàn)。認(rèn)為我應(yīng)該把現(xiàn)有introduction中的幾段話說明白(前半部分應(yīng)該對(duì)我引用的文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行深入解讀,結(jié)論表明了什么,不僅是說明作者做了什么,得出來什么結(jié)論,而且我需要對(duì)這些文獻(xiàn)再多加描述,不然會(huì)讓審稿人認(rèn)為這些文獻(xiàn)我并沒有仔細(xì)看過的感覺;后半部分認(rèn)為我要說明現(xiàn)有文獻(xiàn)的進(jìn)展,不足(結(jié)論不統(tǒng)一等,分析不透徹等,數(shù)據(jù)不合理等)我的研究的亮點(diǎn),介紹一下我的introduction做了什么)。認(rèn)為approaches不是方法的問題,我不應(yīng)該從之前introduction中未寫的模型和方法的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)著手來回答這個(gè)問題。 我現(xiàn)在的困惑是, 1這兩部分評(píng)論是否合起來回復(fù)會(huì)好一些?因?yàn)槲墨I(xiàn)做了什么,結(jié)論的解讀直接一般就延展出了不足,進(jìn)而是本研究的貢獻(xiàn)。 2我認(rèn)為除了老師提到的把之前introduction的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)說明白(包括結(jié)論解讀和現(xiàn)有不足,本文亮點(diǎn))之后,還是應(yīng)該把本文使用模型和方法的文獻(xiàn)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充(即我原先回復(fù)時(shí)的補(bǔ)充) 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
新蟲 (正式寫手)
| 2 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 考研一志愿長(zhǎng)安大學(xué)材料與化工309分請(qǐng)求調(diào)劑 +6 | dtdxzxx 2026-03-06 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 264求調(diào)劑 +5 | thext 2026-03-03 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +6 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-08 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 考研材料與化工,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-09 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 數(shù)二英二309分請(qǐng)求調(diào)劑 +3 | dtdxzxx 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 320材料與化工,求調(diào)劑 +11 | 鶴遨予卿 2026-03-04 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考博] 求材料讀博院校 +8 | yanglei131 2026-03-08 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中科大材料與化工。353分能調(diào)劑到哪? +3 | MayUxw1 2026-03-08 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | squirtle11 2026-03-07 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 考研求調(diào)劑,工科,總分304 +4 | 矮子不想長(zhǎng)高了 2026-03-08 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 080500材料科學(xué)與工程 +13 | 202114020319 2026-03-03 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 282求調(diào)劑 +7 | 夕~日 2026-03-05 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +3 | Trying] 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 泡了個(gè)椒 2026-03-04 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué) 0703求調(diào)劑 總分293 一志愿211 +9 | 土土小蟲 2026-03-03 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 320材料一志愿西工大專碩英二數(shù)二 有兩年光伏工作經(jīng)驗(yàn) +5 | 錘某人 2026-03-04 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +3 | 林小星發(fā)大財(cái) 2026-03-04 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 322分 085600求調(diào)劑,有互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+國(guó)金及主持省級(jí)大創(chuàng)經(jīng)歷 +6 | 熊境喆 2026-03-04 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑,總分320分,一志愿中南民族大學(xué) +3 | 19286712440 2026-03-04 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +4 | 杰尼龜aaa 2026-03-03 | 4/200 |
|