| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5689 | 回復(fù): 11 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) ESEPI ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
|||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
That's because what they are asking or talking is focused on how do you propose your ideas, how do you plan and achieve them, how do you deal with problems, how do you draft your discoveries for papers for your previous project - master thesis, beyond that, anything more important to discuss? |
用戶注銷 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 304分材料專碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | qiuzhigril 2026-03-03 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 化工專碩調(diào)劑 +4 | 利好利好. 2026-03-03 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
085600 英一數(shù)二272求調(diào)劑
5+6
|
vida_a 2026-03-01 | 44/2200 |
|
|
[考研] 成績276,專業(yè)代碼0856求調(diào)劑 +7 | 小陳朵 2026-03-03 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿東北大學(xué)化學(xué)314分求調(diào)劑 +5 | lr1212.. 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +6 | 好運(yùn)連綿不絕 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +5 | kkcoco25 2026-03-02 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 中國科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué)材料與化工281求調(diào)劑,有科研和獲獎(jiǎng)經(jīng)歷 +6 | wsxw 2026-03-02 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
材料工程專碩283求調(diào)劑
5+8
|
,。 2026-03-02 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程求調(diào)劑 +3 | 1431251 2026-03-03 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | north, 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0854復(fù)試調(diào)劑 276 +5 | wmm9 2026-03-01 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 302材料工程求調(diào)劑 +5 | Doleres 2026-03-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 265分求調(diào)劑不調(diào)專業(yè)和學(xué)校有行學(xué)上就 +6 | 禮堂丁真258 2026-02-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +5 | 2026計(jì)算機(jī)_誠心 2026-03-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
[基金申請] 成果系統(tǒng)訪問量大,請一小時(shí)后再嘗試。---NSFC啥時(shí)候好哦,已經(jīng)兩天這樣了 +4 | NSFC2026我來了 2026-02-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 291分工科求調(diào)劑 +9 | science餓餓 2026-03-01 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 295復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | 簡木ChuFront 2026-03-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +9 | 南迦720 2026-02-28 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +4 | 73372112 2026-02-28 | 6/300 |
|