| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5690 | 回復(fù): 11 | |||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個(gè) ESEPI ,點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
Sucked at Interview
|
|||
|
This week I received an invitation for an online interview from an Austrian university and I was so looking forward to speaking to the prof. The interview was held at midnight yesterday, I was surprised to see four people sitting in front of the camera. It wasn't my first time to be interviewed by a group of people but it was indeed the worst one. Most of the questions raised were about my master thesis which is my biggest drawback. I felt like they were so unsatisfied with my background and so became more and more nervous when seeing their reactions to my answers. They asked, for example, what's wrong with your thesis, what kinds of methodologies you adopted, why you didn't use more advanced statistical methods, didn't you have a supervisor who can help you check the direction of your thesis, were data and experiment collected and conducted by you, how you explain that your profile isn't that good? I understand sometimes interviewers prefer to examine candidates by pushing and criticising them, however, questions they kept asking sound they found no interest in my other experience and my research proposal. At last, of course, they didn't ask me about my mobility since obviously, they won't consider me. Writing this post isn't meant to blame on them, I am just curious about the motivation of them to carry out this interview concerning they look caring so much about the quality of my thesis but also have already learnt that it was a bad job from my transcript. I wonder if they think this is acceptable, why they just looked at my past work instead of discussing more current issues like the proposal and other relevant aspects such as the data project I joined last year to get a more comprehensive understanding about me. Conversely, if they think this is too bad to accept, why they should waste their time talking to me for over thirty minutes? I am so confused. Does anyone have the same experience with me? |
|
What they were looking for is an assistant, unlike the regular European PhD positions affiliated to a fixed project, so they didn't tell much about the info of their research projects. They asked for a research proposal but didn't pay much attention to discuss it while the direction of my master thesis is actually not within their research fields. |
用戶注銷 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[論文投稿]
EST拒稿重投
5+3
|
15102603076 2026-03-02 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考博] 26申博 求博導(dǎo) +3 | 愛讀書的小帥 2026-02-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +7 | 張張張張oo 2026-03-03 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學(xué),化學(xué)專業(yè)344分,求調(diào)劑 +6 | 邢xing1 2026-03-02 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿東北大學(xué)化學(xué)314分求調(diào)劑 +5 | lr1212.. 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 化工專碩348,一志愿985求調(diào)劑 +8 | 弗格個(gè) 2026-02-28 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩318求調(diào)劑 +15 | February_Feb 2026-03-01 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)0703求調(diào)劑 學(xué)碩 理/工科均可 總分279 +3 | 1一11 2026-03-03 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 271求調(diào)劑 +4 | Ricardo1113 2026-03-02 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑材料學(xué)碩 +4 | 詞凝Y 2026-03-02 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料化工調(diào)劑 +13 | 今夏不夏 2026-03-01 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 272求調(diào)劑 +9 | 材紫有化 2026-02-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +7 | 明遠(yuǎn)求學(xué) 2026-03-01 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山東大學(xué)材料與化工325求調(diào)劑 +5 | 半截的詩0927 2026-03-02 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +5 | 今夏不夏 2026-03-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 哈工大計(jì)算機(jī)劉劼團(tuán)隊(duì)招生 +4 | hit_aiot 2026-03-01 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +3 | 13853210211 2026-03-02 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 化工299分求調(diào)劑 一志愿985落榜 +5 | 嘻嘻(*^ω^*) 2026-03-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +9 | 南迦720 2026-02-28 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +4 | 73372112 2026-02-28 | 6/300 |
|